Ajou University repository

The Impact of Consumer Inequity Aversion on Firm's Pricing and Return Policies: An Analytical Model
  • QUAN THAI HA
Citations

SCOPUS

0

Citation Export

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisorChang Hwan Lee-
dc.contributor.authorQUAN THAI HA-
dc.date.issued2024-08-
dc.identifier.other33898-
dc.identifier.urihttps://aurora.ajou.ac.kr/handle/2018.oak/38853-
dc.description학위논문(박사)--경영학과,2024. 8-
dc.description.abstractThis research investigates a channel involving a company and fairness-concerned consumers facing product valuation uncertainty. The company offers a return option to mitigate this risk. Our analysis focuses on the impact of inequity aversion on consumer decisions and its consequences for the firm's pricing and return strategies. Our study's findings can be encapsulated into two key points. Firstly, consumers who prioritize fairness are less inclined to return mismatched products if they perceive the company gains disproportionately from the return process. This behavior has a negative impact on the firm's performance. To address this, firms adjust refund policies to motivate consumers to return poorly matched products. Secondly, the formulation of an optimal refund policy by the firm involves weighing the trade-off between two divergent consumer perceptions of unfairness. This includes addressing the sense of unfairness consumers experience with products that fail to meet their expectations versus the perception of inequity when products adequately fulfill their requirements. Both forms of inequity aversion critically influence the firm's pricing and return strategies, as well as its profit generation. These trade-offs can result in the firm implementing an exceptionally generous refund policy, potentially exceeding the initial purchase price. Additionally, our study uncovers two supplementary outcomes. Firstly, we challenge the conventional belief that a higher profit is achieved through implementing a refund policy when the joint benefit of both consumers and the firm from reallocating an unsuitable product outweigh the advantages of retaining and using the product. Our analysis reveals scenarios in which firms can achieve enhanced profitability by diverging from this established principle. Secondly, we find that in certain contexts, heightened consumer sensitivity to unfairness can result in increased prices and profits for the firm. These findings offer a distinct viewpoint, suggesting potential benefits for the firm in catering to fairness-conscious consumers. Our research offers essential insights to guide firms in formulating effective product return policies while dealing with fairness-concerned consumers.-
dc.description.tableofcontents1. Introduction 1_x000D_ <br> 1.1 Research Subject 1_x000D_ <br> 1.2 Research Questions Layout and Introduction of Results 4_x000D_ <br>2. Literature Review 6_x000D_ <br>3. The Model 14_x000D_ <br> 3.1 Basic Assumptions 14_x000D_ <br> 3.2 Consumers' Fairness Concern and Decision Makings 16_x000D_ <br> 3.3 Consumer Market 20_x000D_ <br>4. Equilibrium Policies and the Effect of Unfairness Sensitivity 24_x000D_ <br> 4.1 Consumers' Inequity Aversion and the Firm's Equilibrium Policies 24_x000D_ <br> 4.2 Effect of Unfairness Sensitivity on the Firm's Profit and Consumers' Utility 31_x000D_ <br> 4.3 Effect of Main Parameters 34_x000D_ <br>5. Model Extensions 35_x000D_ <br> 5.1 Fairness minded bargain hunters 35_x000D_ <br> 5.2 Limited refund 35_x000D_ <br> 5.3 Discrete product valuation 37_x000D_ <br>6. Conclusion 49_x000D_ <br>References 52_x000D_ <br>Appendices 57_x000D_ <br> 1 Proof of Proposition 1 58_x000D_ <br> 1.1. Lemma A 58_x000D_ <br> 1.2. Proof of Proposition 1 60_x000D_ <br> 2 Proof of Proposition 2 60_x000D_ <br> 2.1. Lemma B 60_x000D_ <br> 2.2. Proof of Proposition 2-a 61_x000D_ <br> 2.3. Proof of Proposition 2-b 64_x000D_ <br> 2.4. Proof of Lemma 1 70_x000D_ <br> 2.5. Proof of Proposition 2-c 71_x000D_ <br> 3 Proof of Proposition 3 72_x000D_ <br> 4 Proof of Proposition 4 77_x000D_ <br> 4.1. Proof of Proposition 4-a 77_x000D_ <br> 4.2. Proof of Proposition 4-b 87_x000D_ <br> 5 Proof of Proposition 5 90_x000D_ <br> 5.1. Proof of Proposition 5-a 90_x000D_ <br> 5.2. Proof of Proposition 5-b 105_x000D_ <br> 6 Proof of Proposition 6 114_x000D_ <br> 6.1. Proof of Proposition 6-a 114_x000D_ <br> 6.2. Proof of Proposition 6-b 114_x000D_ <br> 7. Proof of Proposition 7 122_x000D_ <br> 7.1. Proof of Lemma C 122_x000D_ <br> 7.2. Proof of Proposition 7 122-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherThe Graduate School, Ajou University-
dc.rights아주대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.-
dc.titleThe Impact of Consumer Inequity Aversion on Firm's Pricing and Return Policies: An Analytical Model-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.contributor.affiliation아주대학교 대학원-
dc.contributor.department일반대학원 경영학과-
dc.date.awarded2024-08-
dc.description.degreeDoctor-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://dcoll.ajou.ac.kr/dcollection/common/orgView/000000033898-
dc.subject.keywordanalytical model-
dc.subject.keywordconsumer inequity aversion-
dc.subject.keywordreturn policy-
Show simple item record

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Total Views & Downloads

File Download

  • There are no files associated with this item.