SCOPUS
0Citation Export
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | Jaeeung Yi | - |
| dc.contributor.author | KEIVAN KARIMIZADEH | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-02 | - |
| dc.identifier.other | 33273 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://aurora.ajou.ac.kr/handle/2018.oak/38826 | - |
| dc.description | 학위논문(박사)--건설교통공학과,2024. 2 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Objectives: Absolutely, climate change is a significant concern impacting our planet in the 21st century. Prediction and understanding how climate change affects the earth planet especially water resources help in planning and managing them effectively. Therefore, in this research an attempt has been made to survey the influence of this issue on climatic and hydrological parameters in Saghez watershed in Iran. Methods: In this research to determine the trend and the slope of changes Sen’s slope estimator and Mann-Kendall tests were applied. Besides, for checking precipitation, temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and solar radiation the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6), and for investigation of runoff the Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) models under the Shared Socio-economic Pathway scenarios (SSPs) used for the future period (2021-2050) compared to the base period (1985-2014). In addition, the Linear Scaling Bias Correction (LSBC) applied to downscale the CMIP6 data. Results: According to findings of Mann-Kendall and Sen’s slope estimator tests precipitation and relative humidity had the falling trend. This falling trend was significant only in minimum relative humidity at the level of 5%. The temperature trend also showed that minimum, average and maximum temperatures had a rising trend, and these rising trends were not significant in any of the mentioned parameters. The trend of changes in wind speed and solar radiation has also risen, and this rising trend was significant in wind speed with the Mann-Kendall's coefficient equals to 3.4 at the level of 1%. The process of changes in runoff in this area also showed that because of the changes in land use and vegetation, watershed's runoff had an increasing trend, but this increasing trend was not impressive in any of the hydrometric stations. The results of predicting the precipitation will have a decrease of 6.1%, while minimum and maximum temperatures will have an rise of 1.6 Cº and 1.4 Cº, respectively. The findings from SWAT model demonstrated that the surface runoff based on SSP5-8.5, SSP3-7.0, and SSP1-2.6 scenarios will have a decrease of 22.8% on average. In addition, investigating using ANN, precipitation is the most effective parameter in changing the runoff. Conclusion: Based on the rise in temperature, drop in soil moisture and happening the flash floods in the study area due to the climate change, the suitable management for this area is crucial. It is recommended to implement the sufficient watershed management operations such as structural and biological operations in the area in order to enhance the vegetation and mitigate the floods due to the climate change. | - |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | I. INTRODUCTION 1_x000D_ <br> A. Description and Expression of The Research Problem 2_x000D_ <br> B. The Importance of The Research 5_x000D_ <br> C. The Research Questions 6_x000D_ <br> D. The Objectives of This Research 6_x000D_ <br> E. Research Method in Terms of Nature 7_x000D_ <br> F. Methods and Tools of Data Collection 7_x000D_ <br> G. Statistical Society and Number of Samples 8_x000D_ <br> H. Sampling Method 8_x000D_ <br>Ⅱ. THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS AND RESEARCH BACKGROUND 9_x000D_ <br> A. Introduction 9_x000D_ <br> B. Theoretical Foundations 9_x000D_ <br> 1. Climate and climatology 9_x000D_ <br> (A) Climate change 10_x000D_ <br> (B) Climate oscillation 11_x000D_ <br> (C) Effective factors on climate change 12_x000D_ <br> (D) Consequences of climate change 12_x000D_ <br> (E) The climate change scenarios 13_x000D_ <br> (1) Non-climatic scenarios 14_x000D_ <br> a. IS92 scenarios 14_x000D_ <br> b. The Special Report on Emission Scenarios (SRES) scenarios 16_x000D_ <br> c. Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenarios 20_x000D_ <br> d. SSP scenarios 22_x000D_ <br> (2) Climatic scenarios 26_x000D_ <br> (F) Climate prediction models 26_x000D_ <br> (G) The Global climate models (GCMs) 27_x000D_ <br> (1) Atmospheric-Oceanic General Circulation Models (AOGCM) 28_x000D_ <br> (H) Downscaling 30_x000D_ <br> C. Literature Review 31_x000D_ <br>III. METHODOLOGY 38_x000D_ <br> A. Study Area 38_x000D_ <br> 1. Climatic conditions 39_x000D_ <br> (A) Precipitation 41_x000D_ <br> (B) Temperature 43_x000D_ <br> (C) Humidity 44_x000D_ <br> (D) Wind 45_x000D_ <br> 2. The topography and hydrographic of the study watershed 47_x000D_ <br> 3. The land use status 50_x000D_ <br> 4. The geological status 50_x000D_ <br> B. Research Methodology 51_x000D_ <br> 1. Nonparametric Mann-Kendall 52_x000D_ <br> 2. The sen's slope estimator 54_x000D_ <br> 3. GCM models 55_x000D_ <br> 4. The study scenarios 56_x000D_ <br> 5. Downscaling 57_x000D_ <br> 6. Performance criteria 58_x000D_ <br> 7. Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) 59_x000D_ <br> 8. Soil & Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) 64_x000D_ <br> (A) Simulation of watershed hydrologic cycle 64_x000D_ <br> (1) Inputs and outputs 67_x000D_ <br> (B) Simulation of hydrological features 68_x000D_ <br> (1) The analysis of uncertainty 68_x000D_ <br> (2) The sequential Uncertainty Fitting (SUFI-2) algorithm 69_x000D_ <br> (3) Model performance evaluation 69_x000D_ <br>IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 71_x000D_ <br> A. Introduction 71_x000D_ <br> B. Investigating The Process of Changes in Climatic Parameters 71_x000D_ <br> C. Assessment of The Cmip6 Models' Performance Based on LSBC 73_x000D_ <br> D. Future Climate Change Forecasting 84_x000D_ <br> 1. Precipitation 84_x000D_ <br> 2. Maximum temperature 85_x000D_ <br> 3. Minimum temperature 86_x000D_ <br> 4. Average temperature 87_x000D_ <br> 5. Relative humidity 88_x000D_ <br> 6. Wind speed 89_x000D_ <br> E. Assessment of climatic parameters impacting runoff using ANN 91_x000D_ <br> F. Simulating runoff using SWAT 94_x000D_ <br> 1. The model's first implementation 94_x000D_ <br> 2. The analysis of sensitivity, calibration and validation 95_x000D_ <br> (A) The analysis of sensitivity 95_x000D_ <br> (B) Implementing of calibration and validation 95_x000D_ <br> 3. The evaluation of model performance 96_x000D_ <br> 4. Modeling the impact of climate and land use change 98_x000D_ <br> (A) Land use change's effect modeling 99_x000D_ <br> (B) Watershed's runoff 101_x000D_ <br>V. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 105_x000D_ <br> A. Introduction 105_x000D_ <br> B. Discussion and Conclusion 105_x000D_ <br> C. Research problems and limitations 108_x000D_ <br> D. Suggestions 109_x000D_ <br>REFERENCES 111_x000D_ | - |
| dc.language.iso | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | The Graduate School, Ajou University | - |
| dc.rights | 아주대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다. | - |
| dc.title | Prediction Model for Hydrological Responses of Watershed using SWAT and ANN under Climate Change Scenarios | - |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | 아주대학교 대학원 | - |
| dc.contributor.department | 일반대학원 건설교통공학과 | - |
| dc.date.awarded | 2024-02 | - |
| dc.description.degree | Doctor | - |
| dc.identifier.url | https://dcoll.ajou.ac.kr/dcollection/common/orgView/000000033273 | - |
| dc.subject.keyword | Saghez watershed | - |
| dc.subject.keyword | climate change | - |
| dc.subject.keyword | CMIP6 | - |
| dc.subject.keyword | SWAT | - |
| dc.subject.keyword | ANN | - |
| dc.subject.keyword | SSPs | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.