Citation Export
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Seungwoon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ali, Jehad | - |
dc.contributor.author | Roh, Byeong Hee | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-04-08 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://aurora.ajou.ac.kr/handle/2018.oak/36438 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85064985154&origin=inward | - |
dc.description.abstract | Software Defined Networking (SDN) has revolutionized the networking industry and also tactical communication due to its flexibility, innovation, and ease of programmability. However, modeling, evaluation, and testing of SDN based applications present several challenges. Mininet simulator has been developed for the study of SDN and used for SDN simulation in general. Although it is possible to prototype virtual SDN networks fast with Mininet, it is not for stress testing to validate the stability and reliability and simulation suitable for the real environment. The state-of-the-art network simulation tool OPNET recently OPNET has introduced the SDN Model, which can be used with a system in the loop (SITL). However, there is no research published yet which shows the use of OPNET for SDN. This paper rigorously compares the OPNET and Mininet for SDN experiments. we compare end-to-end delay, jitter, and RTT between controllers and switches. As a result, the Mininet environment cannot apply the network load, so it is desirable to use OPNET for simulation of the real environment or for the stability and reliability test. | - |
dc.description.sponsorship | ACKNOWLEDGMENT This work has been supported by the Future Combat System Network Technology Research Center program of Defense Acquisition Program Administration and Agency for Defense Development. (UD160070BD) | - |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. | - |
dc.subject.mesh | End to end delay | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Mininet | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Model and simulation | - |
dc.subject.mesh | OPNET | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Tactical network | - |
dc.title | Performance Comparison of Software Defined Networking Simulators for Tactical Network: Mininet vs. OPNET | - |
dc.type | Conference | - |
dc.citation.conferenceDate | 2019.2.18. ~ 2019.2.21. | - |
dc.citation.conferenceName | 2019 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications, ICNC 2019 | - |
dc.citation.edition | 2019 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications, ICNC 2019 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 202 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 197 | - |
dc.citation.title | 2019 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications, ICNC 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 2019 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications, ICNC 2019, pp.197-202 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1109/iccnc.2019.8685572 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85064985154 | - |
dc.identifier.url | http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=8681004 | - |
dc.subject.keyword | End-To-End Delay | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Jitter | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Mininet | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Modeling and Simulation | - |
dc.subject.keyword | OPNET | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Software-Defined Networking | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Tactical Network | - |
dc.type.other | Conference Paper | - |
dc.description.isoa | false | - |
dc.subject.subarea | Computer Networks and Communications | - |
dc.subject.subarea | Software | - |
dc.subject.subarea | Hardware and Architecture | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.