Ajou University repository

Performance Comparison of Software Defined Networking Simulators for Tactical Network: Mininet vs. OPNET
Citations

SCOPUS

0

Citation Export

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Seungwoon-
dc.contributor.authorAli, Jehad-
dc.contributor.authorRoh, Byeong Hee-
dc.date.issued2019-04-08-
dc.identifier.urihttps://aurora.ajou.ac.kr/handle/2018.oak/36438-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85064985154&origin=inward-
dc.description.abstractSoftware Defined Networking (SDN) has revolutionized the networking industry and also tactical communication due to its flexibility, innovation, and ease of programmability. However, modeling, evaluation, and testing of SDN based applications present several challenges. Mininet simulator has been developed for the study of SDN and used for SDN simulation in general. Although it is possible to prototype virtual SDN networks fast with Mininet, it is not for stress testing to validate the stability and reliability and simulation suitable for the real environment. The state-of-the-art network simulation tool OPNET recently OPNET has introduced the SDN Model, which can be used with a system in the loop (SITL). However, there is no research published yet which shows the use of OPNET for SDN. This paper rigorously compares the OPNET and Mininet for SDN experiments. we compare end-to-end delay, jitter, and RTT between controllers and switches. As a result, the Mininet environment cannot apply the network load, so it is desirable to use OPNET for simulation of the real environment or for the stability and reliability test.-
dc.description.sponsorshipACKNOWLEDGMENT This work has been supported by the Future Combat System Network Technology Research Center program of Defense Acquisition Program Administration and Agency for Defense Development. (UD160070BD)-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.-
dc.subject.meshEnd to end delay-
dc.subject.meshMininet-
dc.subject.meshModel and simulation-
dc.subject.meshOPNET-
dc.subject.meshTactical network-
dc.titlePerformance Comparison of Software Defined Networking Simulators for Tactical Network: Mininet vs. OPNET-
dc.typeConference-
dc.citation.conferenceDate2019.2.18. ~ 2019.2.21.-
dc.citation.conferenceName2019 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications, ICNC 2019-
dc.citation.edition2019 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications, ICNC 2019-
dc.citation.endPage202-
dc.citation.startPage197-
dc.citation.title2019 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications, ICNC 2019-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation2019 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications, ICNC 2019, pp.197-202-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/iccnc.2019.8685572-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85064985154-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=8681004-
dc.subject.keywordEnd-To-End Delay-
dc.subject.keywordJitter-
dc.subject.keywordMininet-
dc.subject.keywordModeling and Simulation-
dc.subject.keywordOPNET-
dc.subject.keywordSoftware-Defined Networking-
dc.subject.keywordTactical Network-
dc.type.otherConference Paper-
dc.description.isoafalse-
dc.subject.subareaComputer Networks and Communications-
dc.subject.subareaSoftware-
dc.subject.subareaHardware and Architecture-
Show simple item record

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

ALI JEHAD Image
ALI JEHADJEHAD, ALI
Department of Software and Computer Engineering
Read More

Total Views & Downloads

File Download

  • There are no files associated with this item.