Ajou University repository

One in three or three in one: Integrating three competing theoretical models (TPB, VIP, and PADM) to explain the intentions to act/actions against climate changeoa mark
Citations

SCOPUS

1

Citation Export

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Miri-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Seoyong-
dc.contributor.authorJeon, Sehyeok-
dc.date.issued2024-11-15-
dc.identifier.issn2405-8440-
dc.identifier.urihttps://aurora.ajou.ac.kr/handle/2018.oak/34562-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85207812612&origin=inward-
dc.description.abstractThis study examines multidimensional factors affecting climate change response behavior. It constructs an integrated model based on the theory of planned behavior, value–identity–personal norms model, and protective action decision model, as a single theory cannot capture the complex nature of human behavior. Recent studies have shown that integrating theories include various influencing factors and indicate higher explanatory power. Therefore, this study uses an integrated model to identify multidimensional influencing factors. The fit of the integrated model was confirmed to be excellent (Chi-square = 1271.866, p = .000, GFI = 0.930, NFI = 0.940, RMSEA = 0.060, TLI = 0.937, SRMR = 0.059), and identity exhibited the greatest effect on personal norms, followed by intention on behavior. The integrated model suggests the following path: ecological value → identity → personal norms → stakeholder awareness → intention → behavior and then ecological value → identity → perceived behavioral control → risk awareness → intention → behavior. The results of the integrated model suggest that a multifaceted approach is necessary to promote climate change response behavior. Various factors, such as ecological value, identity, personal norms, stakeholder awareness, perceived behavioral control, and risk awareness, interact and influence behavior. Policies and programs that comprehensively consider these factors should be established.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2021S1A5C2A02087244).This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2021S1A5C2A02087244).-
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2021S1A5C2A02087244).-
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2021S1A5C2A02087244).-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd-
dc.titleOne in three or three in one: Integrating three competing theoretical models (TPB, VIP, and PADM) to explain the intentions to act/actions against climate change-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.citation.number21-
dc.citation.titleHeliyon-
dc.citation.volume10-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationHeliyon, Vol.10 No.21-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39337-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85207812612-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/24058440-
dc.subject.keywordClimate change awareness-
dc.subject.keywordProtective action decision model-
dc.subject.keywordResponse to climate change-
dc.subject.keywordTheory of planned behavior-
dc.subject.keywordValue–identity–personal norms model-
dc.type.otherArticle-
dc.description.isoatrue-
dc.subject.subareaMultidisciplinary-
Show simple item record

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Kim, SeoYong Image
Kim, SeoYong김서용
Department of Public Administration
Read More

Total Views & Downloads

File Download

  • There are no files associated with this item.