Ajou University repository

Hybrid IFDMB/4D-Var inverse modeling to constrain the spatiotemporal distribution of CO and NO2 emissions using the CMAQ adjoint model
  • Moon, Jeonghyeok ;
  • Choi, Yunsoo ;
  • Jeon, Wonbae ;
  • Kim, Hyun Cheol ;
  • Pouyaei, Arman ;
  • Jung, Jia ;
  • Pan, Shuai ;
  • Kim, Soontae ;
  • Kim, Cheol Hee ;
  • Bak, Juseon ;
  • Yoo, Jung Woo ;
  • Park, Jaehyeong ;
  • Kim, Dongjin
Citations

SCOPUS

3

Citation Export

Publication Year
2024-06-15
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd
Citation
Atmospheric Environment, Vol.327
Keyword
4D-varAdjoint modelCMAQIFDMBInverse modelingSouth Korea
Mesh Keyword
4d-varAdjoint modellingCommunity multi-scale air qualitiesDistribution of emissionsInverse modellingIterative finite difference mass balanceMass balancePerformanceSouth KoreaSpatiotemporal distributions
All Science Classification Codes (ASJC)
Environmental Science (all)Atmospheric Science
Abstract
We performed a hybrid approach that combines the iterative finite difference mass balance (IFDMB) and four-dimensional variational data assimilation (4D-Var) methods to effectively constrain the spatiotemporal distribution of emissions. To quantitatively compare the performance of inverse modeling in constraining CO and NO2 emissions in South Korea spatiotemporally, we conducted a model-based twin experiment for three inverse modeling methods: IFDMB, 4D-Var, and hybrid inversions. We performed numerical modeling using the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) and its adjoints to calculate the values required for inverse modeling. As a result, the IFDMB inversion can effectively constrain the average spatial distribution of emissions. Meanwhile, the 4D-Var inversion can help estimate temporal variations in emissions, but it is not effective in regions with large prior emission errors. The hybrid inversion showed the best performance in constraining the spatiotemporal distribution of emissions because it combined the strengths of the two aforementioned methods. Furthermore, to compare the performance of the inverse modeling of pollutants with different chemical properties, we conducted additional inverse modeling for highly reactive NO2. After the application of inverse modeling, the emission errors of NO2 (18.339%) were larger than those of CO (10.593%). This difference in inverse modeling errors was due to the greater nonlinear relationship between emissions and concentrations in the inverse modeling process for NO2, which is more reactive compared to CO. In this study, the ideal modeling tests were performed to quantitatively assess the performance of inverse modeling. In future studies, we expect to apply the hybrid inversion approach used in this study to inverse modeling using actual observations.
Language
eng
URI
https://dspace.ajou.ac.kr/dev/handle/2018.oak/34088
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120490
Fulltext

Type
Article
Funding
This research was partially supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2020R1A6A1A03044834) and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2023R1A2C1002608). H.C.K was also supported by NOAA grant NA19NES4320002 (CISESS).
Show full item record

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Kim, Soontae  Image
Kim, Soontae 김순태
Department of Environmental and Safety Engineering
Read More

Total Views & Downloads

File Download

  • There are no files associated with this item.