Ajou University repository

Network cost allocation methods for pay-as-bid peer-to-peer energy trading: A comparisonoa mark
  • Noorfatima, N. ;
  • Choi, Y. ;
  • Onen, A. ;
  • Jung, J.
Citations

SCOPUS

8

Citation Export

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorNoorfatima, N.-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Y.-
dc.contributor.authorOnen, A.-
dc.contributor.authorJung, J.-
dc.date.issued2022-11-01-
dc.identifier.issn2352-4847-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ajou.ac.kr/dev/handle/2018.oak/33039-
dc.description.abstractIn pay-as-bid peer-to-peer (P2P) energy trading, various types of prosumers and consumers can participate, regardless of their offers. Thus, various types of participants impact the network differently. However, very few pay-as-bid P2P energy trading studies have specifically discussed appropriate compensation for network usage, although the market is implemented in existing utility-owned grids. Therefore, to improve the performance of pay-as-bid P2P energy trading, it is important to determine the appropriate compensation to utilities for network usage. This study aims to obtain an appropriate network cost allocation method for pay-as-bid P2P energy trading. Hence, the authors present a review of pay-as-bid P2P market mechanisms and various network cost allocation (NCA) methods. Additionally, a comprehensive evaluation framework is proposed to determine the most appropriate NCA method for the pay-as-bid P2P energy trading system. A comparison was made between various NCA methods to investigate the outcomes of the implementation of different NCA methods to various market conditions. The study constructs a case study based on the operator-oriented P2P model to represent the pay-as-bid P2P energy trading system. The simulation of pay-as-bid P2P energy trading with large participant number is applied in the IEEE 69-bus distribution system. The study concluded that applying the appropriate NCA method would improve the performance of pay-as-bid P2P energy trading operation.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was also supported by “Human Resources Program in Energy Technology” of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) , granted financial resource from the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea (No. 20194030202370 ).-
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (No. 20191210301820 ).-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd-
dc.subject.meshAllocation methods-
dc.subject.meshEnergy trading-
dc.subject.meshEvaluation framework-
dc.subject.meshNetwork cost allocation-
dc.subject.meshNetwork usage-
dc.subject.meshNetwork usage cost-
dc.subject.meshPay as bid-
dc.subject.meshPeer to peer-
dc.subject.meshPeer-to-peer energy trading-
dc.subject.meshPerformance-
dc.titleNetwork cost allocation methods for pay-as-bid peer-to-peer energy trading: A comparison-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.citation.endPage14463-
dc.citation.startPage14442-
dc.citation.titleEnergy Reports-
dc.citation.volume8-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationEnergy Reports, Vol.8, pp.14442-14463-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.405-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85141520811-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy-reports/-
dc.subject.keywordEvaluation framework-
dc.subject.keywordNetwork cost allocation-
dc.subject.keywordNetwork usage cost-
dc.subject.keywordPay-as-bid-
dc.subject.keywordPeer-to-peer energy trading-
dc.description.isoatrue-
dc.subject.subareaEnergy (all)-
Show simple item record

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Jung, Jaesung  Image
Jung, Jaesung 정재성
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Read More

Total Views & Downloads

File Download

  • There are no files associated with this item.