Citation Export
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Noorfatima, N. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, Y. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Onen, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jung, J. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-11-01 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2352-4847 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.ajou.ac.kr/dev/handle/2018.oak/33039 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In pay-as-bid peer-to-peer (P2P) energy trading, various types of prosumers and consumers can participate, regardless of their offers. Thus, various types of participants impact the network differently. However, very few pay-as-bid P2P energy trading studies have specifically discussed appropriate compensation for network usage, although the market is implemented in existing utility-owned grids. Therefore, to improve the performance of pay-as-bid P2P energy trading, it is important to determine the appropriate compensation to utilities for network usage. This study aims to obtain an appropriate network cost allocation method for pay-as-bid P2P energy trading. Hence, the authors present a review of pay-as-bid P2P market mechanisms and various network cost allocation (NCA) methods. Additionally, a comprehensive evaluation framework is proposed to determine the most appropriate NCA method for the pay-as-bid P2P energy trading system. A comparison was made between various NCA methods to investigate the outcomes of the implementation of different NCA methods to various market conditions. The study constructs a case study based on the operator-oriented P2P model to represent the pay-as-bid P2P energy trading system. The simulation of pay-as-bid P2P energy trading with large participant number is applied in the IEEE 69-bus distribution system. The study concluded that applying the appropriate NCA method would improve the performance of pay-as-bid P2P energy trading operation. | - |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work was also supported by “Human Resources Program in Energy Technology” of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) , granted financial resource from the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea (No. 20194030202370 ). | - |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (No. 20191210301820 ). | - |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Allocation methods | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Energy trading | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Evaluation framework | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Network cost allocation | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Network usage | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Network usage cost | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Pay as bid | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Peer to peer | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Peer-to-peer energy trading | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Performance | - |
dc.title | Network cost allocation methods for pay-as-bid peer-to-peer energy trading: A comparison | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 14463 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 14442 | - |
dc.citation.title | Energy Reports | - |
dc.citation.volume | 8 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Energy Reports, Vol.8, pp.14442-14463 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.405 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85141520811 | - |
dc.identifier.url | http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy-reports/ | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Evaluation framework | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Network cost allocation | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Network usage cost | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Pay-as-bid | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Peer-to-peer energy trading | - |
dc.description.isoa | true | - |
dc.subject.subarea | Energy (all) | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.