Ajou University repository

A comparative study on hybrid power-to-liquids/power-to-gas processes coupled with different water electrolysis technologies
  • Gao, Ruxing ;
  • Zhang, Leiyu ;
  • Wang, Lei ;
  • Zhang, Xiudong ;
  • Zhang, Chundong ;
  • Jun, Ki Won ;
  • Ki Kim, Seok ;
  • Park, Hae Gu ;
  • Gao, Ying ;
  • Zhu, Yuezhao ;
  • Zhao, Tiansheng ;
  • Wan, Hui ;
  • Guan, Guofeng
Citations

SCOPUS

31

Citation Export

Publication Year
2022-07-01
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd
Citation
Energy Conversion and Management, Vol.263
Keyword
Power-to-gasPower-to-liquidsProcess modellingTechnical comparisonWater electrolysis
Mesh Keyword
Hybrid processLiquid powerMembrane electrolysisPowerPower-to-gasPower-to-liquidProcess-modelsTechnical comparisonWater electrolysis
All Science Classification Codes (ASJC)
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the EnvironmentNuclear Energy and EngineeringFuel TechnologyEnergy Engineering and Power Technology
Abstract
Recently, Power-to-Liquids (PTL) and Power-to-Gas (PTG) processes have been attracting extensive attentions as carbon-neutral technologies because they transform wasted CO2 into sustainable liquid fuels and synthetic natural gas, meanwhile storing the excess and intermittent renewable energies into stable chemical energies. In both PTL and PTG processes, hydrogen production is a key step, which can be achieved by using different water electrolysis technologies, such as alkaline water electrolysis (AWE), anion exchange membrane electrolysis (AEM), proton exchange membrane electrolysis (PEM) and solid oxide electrolysis (SOEC). In this work, to implement a systematic comparison of the effects of different water electrolysis technologies on the technical performances of the PTL/PTG hybrid process, we proposed four PTL/PTG hybrid process cases coupled with the aforementioned water electrolysis technologies, and conducted a detailed comparative technical analysis in terms of energy efficiency, carbon efficiency, net CO2 reduction rate and exergy efficiency. The results revealed that all the proposed process cases can be considered as essential candidate technologies for CO2 transformation, and the PTL/PTG hybrid process combined with SOEC is more competitive in terms of energy and exergy efficiencies, whereas that combined with AEM shows higher carbon efficiency and net CO2 reduction rate. Moreover, we also compared the process performances of the PTL/PTG hybrid processes combined with SOEC via the direct and indirect routes. It seems that both the indirect and direct ones are comparable in energy and exergy efficiencies. However, the direct one benefits CO2 mitigation, while, the indirect one favors syncrude production.
ISSN
0196-8904
Language
eng
URI
https://dspace.ajou.ac.kr/dev/handle/2018.oak/32689
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115671
Fulltext

Type
Article
Funding
This work was supported by the \u201cNext Generation Carbon Upcycling Project\u201d (Project No. 2017M1A2A2043133) through the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea. We also appreciate the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20200694, 20KJB530002, 21KJB480014), the Jiangsu Specially-Appointed Professors Program, and the open program of the State Key Laboratory of High-efficiency Utilization of Coal and Green Chemical Engineering (2021-K32).
Show full item record

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Kim, Seok Ki  Image
Kim, Seok Ki 김석기
Department of Chemical Engineering
Read More

Total Views & Downloads

File Download

  • There are no files associated with this item.