Ajou University repository

Implicit force and position control to improve drilling quality in CFRP flexible robotic machiningoa mark
Citations

SCOPUS

28

Citation Export

Publication Year
2021-08-01
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd
Citation
Journal of Manufacturing Processes, Vol.68, pp.1123-1133
Keyword
CFRPControlDrillingRobotic machiningRobotics
Mesh Keyword
AutomotivesCarbon-fibre reinforced plasticsDrilling qualityFlexible roboticsHigh-strengthMachining systemsPlastic flexibleReduce costsRobotic machiningWorkpiece
All Science Classification Codes (ASJC)
Strategy and ManagementManagement Science and Operations ResearchIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Abstract
Flexible machining systems are being widely applied in the aircraft and automotive industries to reduce costs and increase productivity. The workpieces for the corresponding applications are bigger and more varied than those for conventional applications. These workpieces can be made of carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) because it provides a high strength-to-weight ratio. Nevertheless, CFRP has poor machinability owing to its brittleness. To achieve flexible machining, industrial robots are being increasingly adopted, especially for drilling. However, they cannot meet industrial requirements such as machining precision, cost, and productivity. This is because industrial robots have a considerably lower stiffness than conventional computer numerical control machines given their structure consisting of serial links. Consequently, tasks such as drilling using industrial robots may present production defects. Drilling defects generally appear as burrs in the hole entrance and deviations of the desired hole center. In this study, the patterns and causes of such defects during robotic drilling were analyzed, and it was determined that the main defect was caused by the deviation of the tool tip due to the low robot stiffness. The defect was then corrected using implicit force and position control. Experimental results showed that when the defect was corrected, the maximum hole diameter error decreased by 16.68% when compared with a scenario in which no compensation for the defect was made. In addition, the maximum error decreased by 10.83% when compared with drilling that was guided by a pilot hole.
ISSN
1526-6125
Language
eng
URI
https://dspace.ajou.ac.kr/dev/handle/2018.oak/32105
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.06.038
Fulltext

Type
Article
Funding
This research was funded under the Korea Institute of Industrial Technology ( JE210008 ) and MOTIE ( 20011498 ), Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT).
Show full item record

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Jeon, Yongho  Image
Jeon, Yongho 전용호
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Read More

Total Views & Downloads

File Download

  • There are no files associated with this item.