Ajou University repository

Impact of 2D-3D Heterointerface on Remote Epitaxial Interaction through Graphene
  • Kim, Hyunseok ;
  • Lu, Kuangye ;
  • Liu, Yunpeng ;
  • Kum, Hyun S. ;
  • Kim, Ki Seok ;
  • Qiao, Kuan ;
  • Bae, Sang Hoon ;
  • Lee, Sangho ;
  • Ji, You Jin ;
  • Kim, Ki Hyun ;
  • Paik, Hanjong ;
  • Xie, Saien ;
  • Shin, Heechang ;
  • Choi, Chanyeol ;
  • Lee, June Hyuk ;
  • Dong, Chengye ;
  • Robinson, Joshua A. ;
  • Lee, Jae Hyun ;
  • Ahn, Jong Hyun ;
  • Yeom, Geun Young ;
  • Schlom, Darrell G. ;
  • Kim, Jeehwan
Citations

SCOPUS

77

Citation Export

Publication Year
2021-06-22
Publisher
American Chemical Society
Citation
ACS Nano, Vol.15, pp.10587-10596
Keyword
grapheneheterointegrationionicityremote epitaxysingle-crystal membranetransfer process
Mesh Keyword
Electrostatic couplingEpitaxial materialsGraphene substratesProcessing conditionRemote interactionsSingle crystal epitaxySubstrate materialTwo Dimensional (2 D)
All Science Classification Codes (ASJC)
Materials Science (all)Engineering (all)Physics and Astronomy (all)
Abstract
Remote epitaxy has drawn attention as it offers epitaxy of functional materials that can be released from the substrates with atomic precision, thus enabling production and heterointegration of flexible, transferrable, and stackable freestanding single-crystalline membranes. In addition, the remote interaction of atoms and adatoms through two-dimensional (2D) materials in remote epitaxy allows investigation and utilization of electrical/chemical/physical coupling of bulk (3D) materials via 2D materials (3D-2D-3D coupling). Here, we unveil the respective roles and impacts of the substrate material, graphene, substrate-graphene interface, and epitaxial material for electrostatic coupling of these materials, which governs cohesive ordering and can lead to single-crystal epitaxy in the overlying film. We show that simply coating a graphene layer on wafers does not guarantee successful implementation of remote epitaxy, since atomically precise control of the graphene-coated interface is required, and provides key considerations for maximizing the remote electrostatic interaction between the substrate and adatoms. This was enabled by exploring various material systems and processing conditions, and we demonstrate that the rules of remote epitaxy vary significantly depending on the ionicity of material systems as well as the graphene-substrate interface and the epitaxy environment. The general rule of thumb discovered here enables expanding 3D material libraries that can be stacked in freestanding form.
Language
eng
URI
https://dspace.ajou.ac.kr/dev/handle/2018.oak/32097
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c03296
Fulltext

Type
Article
Funding
This work is primarily supported by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Young Faculty Award (Award No. 029584-00001) and by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) under the Solar Energy Technologies Office (award no. DE-EE0008558). The team at MIT also acknowledges support from the Air Force Research Laboratory (FA9453-18-2-0017 and FA9453-21-C-0717) and from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) (Award No. 027049-00001, W. Carters and J. Gimlett). C.D. and J.A.R acknowledge the Penn State 2D Crystal Consortium (2DCC)-Materials Innovation Platform (2DCC-MIP) under NSF cooperative agreement DMR-1539916. The work at Cornell University is supported by the National Science Foundation (Platform for the Accelerated Realization, Analysis and Discovery of Interface Materials (PARADIM)) under Cooperative Agreement No. DMR-1539918.This work is primarily supported by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Young Faculty Award (Award No. 029584-00001) and by the U.S. Department of Energy?s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) under the Solar Energy Technologies Office (award no. DE-EE0008558). The team at MIT also acknowledges support from the Air Force Research Laboratory (FA9453-18-2-0017 and FA9453-21-C-0717) and from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) (Award No. 027049-00001, W. Carters and J. Gimlett). C.D. and J.A.R acknowledge the Penn State 2D Crystal Consortium (2DCC)-Materials Innovation Platform (2DCC-MIP) under NSF cooperative agreement DMR-1539916. The work at Cornell University is supported by the National Science Foundation (Platform for the Accelerated Realization, Analysis and Discovery of Interface Materials (PARADIM)) under Cooperative Agreement No. DMR-1539918.
Show full item record

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Total Views & Downloads

File Download

  • There are no files associated with this item.