Ajou University repository

Rim-arterial enhancing primary hepatic tumors with other targetoid appearance show early recurrence after radiofrequency ablation
  • Cha, Dong Ik ;
  • Lee, Min Woo ;
  • Jeong, Woo Kyoung ;
  • Ahn, Soo Hyun ;
  • Kang, Tae Wook ;
  • Song, Kyoung Doo ;
  • Min, Ji Hye ;
  • Rhim, Hyunchul ;
  • Lim, Hyo Keun
Citations

SCOPUS

7

Citation Export

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorCha, Dong Ik-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Min Woo-
dc.contributor.authorJeong, Woo Kyoung-
dc.contributor.authorAhn, Soo Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Tae Wook-
dc.contributor.authorSong, Kyoung Doo-
dc.contributor.authorMin, Ji Hye-
dc.contributor.authorRhim, Hyunchul-
dc.contributor.authorLim, Hyo Keun-
dc.date.issued2021-09-01-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ajou.ac.kr/dev/handle/2018.oak/31920-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To evaluate early (≤ 2 years) local tumor progression (LTP), intrahepatic distant metastasis (IDR), and extrahepatic metastasis (EM) of primary hepatic malignant tumors with arterial rim enhancement (RE) after RFA in comparison with non-RE tumors. Methods: Three hundred forty-nine patients who underwent RFA for primary hepatic malignant tumors between January 2009 and December 2016 were included. The patients’ tumors were classified into non-RE, RE only (RO), and RE plus other targetoid appearances (REoT). Cumulative LTP, IDR, and EM rates at 1 and 2 years after RFA were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Prognostic factors for the outcomes were assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: There were 303 non-RE, 19 RO, and 27 REoT tumors. The REoT tumors had a significantly higher rate of IDR and EM than non-RE (p = 0.04 for IDR; and p < 0.01 for EM, respectively) at 1 year after RFA. At 2 years, LTP and EM rates were significantly higher for REoT than for non-RE (p = 0.001 for LTP; and p = 0.444 for EM, respectively). The RO tumors did not have different outcomes than non-RE at 1 and 2 years after RFA. Multivariable analysis verified that REoT was a significant factor for IDR (p = 0.04) and EM (p = 0.01) at 1 year and LTP (p = 0.02) at 2 years. Conclusions: Tumors with REoT had poor LTP, IDR, and EM within 2 years after RFA than non-RE tumors. However, tumors with RO showed similar results as non-RE tumors. Key Points: • Tumors with Rim enhancement plus other targetoid appearances (REoT) had a significantly higher rate of recurrence than non-rim enhancing (RE) tumors at 1 and 2 years after RFA. • Tumors with rim enhancement only did not have different outcomes than non-RE at 1 and 2 years after RFA.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH-
dc.subject.meshCarcinoma, Hepatocellular-
dc.subject.meshCatheter Ablation-
dc.subject.meshHumans-
dc.subject.meshLiver Neoplasms-
dc.subject.meshNeoplasm Recurrence, Local-
dc.subject.meshRadiofrequency Ablation-
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleRim-arterial enhancing primary hepatic tumors with other targetoid appearance show early recurrence after radiofrequency ablation-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.citation.endPage6567-
dc.citation.startPage6555-
dc.citation.titleEuropean Radiology-
dc.citation.volume31-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationEuropean Radiology, Vol.31, pp.6555-6567-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00330-021-07769-1-
dc.identifier.pmid33713169-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85102697746-
dc.identifier.urlwww.link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00330/index.htm-
dc.subject.keywordCarcinoma, hepatocellular-
dc.subject.keywordMagnetic resonance imaging-
dc.subject.keywordRadiofrequency ablation-
dc.subject.keywordRecurrence-
dc.description.isoafalse-
dc.subject.subareaRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging-
Show simple item record

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Ahn, Soohyun Image
Ahn, Soohyun안수현
Department of Mathematics
Read More

Total Views & Downloads

File Download

  • There are no files associated with this item.