Ajou University repository

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)1oa mark
Citations

SCOPUS

1802

Citation Export

Publication Year
2021-01-01
Publisher
Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Citation
Autophagy, Vol.17, pp.1-382
Keyword
AutophagosomecancerfluxLC3lysosomemacroautophagyneurodegenerationphagophorestressvacuole
Mesh Keyword
AnimalsAutophagosomesAutophagyAutophagy-Related ProteinsBiological AssayBiomarkersHumansLysosomes
All Science Classification Codes (ASJC)
Molecular BiologyCell Biology
Abstract
In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.
Language
eng
URI
https://dspace.ajou.ac.kr/dev/handle/2018.oak/31916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280
Fulltext

Type
Review
Funding
This work was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences [GM131919]. Due to space and other limitations, it is not possible to include all other sources of financial support. In a rapidly expanding and highly dynamic field such as autophagy, it is possible that some authors who should have been included on this manuscript have been missed. D.J.K. extends his apologies to researchers in the field of autophagy who, due to oversight or any other reason, could not be included on this manuscript.
Show full item record

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Baek, Seung-Hoon Image
Baek, Seung-Hoon백승훈
Division of Pharmacy Sciences
Read More

Total Views & Downloads

File Download

  • There are no files associated with this item.