Ajou University repository

Comparison of different hybrid modeling methods to estimate intraurban NO2 concentrations
  • Oh, Inbo ;
  • Hwang, Mi Kyoung ;
  • Bang, Jin Hee ;
  • Yang, Wonho ;
  • Kim, Soontae ;
  • Lee, Kiyoung ;
  • Seo, Sung Chul ;
  • Lee, Jiho ;
  • Kim, Yangho
Citations

SCOPUS

13

Citation Export

Publication Year
2021-01-01
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd
Citation
Atmospheric Environment, Vol.244
Keyword
Air pollutionCALPUFFCMAQHybrid modelLURNO2
Mesh Keyword
Air pollutant concentrationsExposure assessmentHigh-resolution modelsHybrid modeling methodsImprovement of methodsLand-use regression modelsRegional photochemical modelingSub-grid variability
All Science Classification Codes (ASJC)
Environmental Science (all)Atmospheric Science
Abstract
Exposure to air pollution has a significant impact on the health of urban populations, so the improvement of methods that model the concentrations of air pollutants within complex urban areas is important in health studies to adequately asses the exposure of the population. This paper presents several hybrid, high-resolution models to simulate the variability of ambient NO2 concentrations in Seoul, the capital of South Korea. These models combine the Community Multiscale Quality (CMAQ) as a regional photochemical model with a fine scale model of either the California Puff dispersion model (CALPUFF) or the land use regression model (LUR). We compared high-resolution estimates of the spatial NO2 concentration from four different hybrid models, including 1) raw CMAQ-CALPUFF; 2) observation-fused CMAQ-CALPUFF; 3) raw CMAQ-LUR; and 4) observation-fused CMAQ-LUR. We conducted numerical simulations of the NO2 concentrations during the winter season and compared the results with field data obtained from mobile measurements captured from December 2017 to February 2018. The results indicate that observation-fused hybrid models offered improved agreement with the mobile measurements: for the CMAQ-CALPUFF model, statistical bias and error were reduced to about 82% and 57%, respectively by using observation-fused CMAQ. We also found significant differences in the sub-grid variability of the NO2 concentrations for the different hybrid models. The predictions obtained with CMAQ-CALPUFF showed concentrations that were more widely distributed (1.7 and 1.4 times for the 10–90th range, observation-fused case) when compared to the only-CMAQ and CMAQ-LUR predictions, respectively. Our study suggests that a properly evaluated hybrid model can increase the predictive accuracy of air pollutant concentration in complex urban areas to improve exposure assessments in health studies.
Language
eng
URI
https://dspace.ajou.ac.kr/dev/handle/2018.oak/31546
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117907
Fulltext

Type
Article
Funding
This work was supported by the Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute ( KEITI ) through the Environmental Health Action Program, funded by Korea Ministry of Environment ( MOE ) (2018001350001).CMAQ-ready emission inputs were prepared using anthropogenic and biogenic emission models. Anthropogenic emissions were processed through the Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions (SMOKE, version 4.2) modelling system (UNC, 2016) using the Clean Air Policy Support System (CAPSS) (Lee et al., 2011) 2013 of the Korean NIER for data on domestic sources and the Model Inter-comparison Study for Asia (MICS-Asia) (Li et al., 2017) 2010 for data on foreign sources. Further details on the processing of Korean emission inventory developed for the CAPSS to generate CMAQ model-ready emission inputs using the SMOKE system can be found in Kim et al. (2008). Biogenic emissions were generated by inputting vegetation data (leaf area index, plant functional type, emission factors, etc.), and meteorological data produced by MCIP to the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN) version 2.04 (Guenther et al., 2006). Those over South Korea were calculated using the Biogenic Emission Inventory System (BEIS) model (version 3.14) with South Korea's domestic vegetation data and emissions factors (Kim et al., 2017b; Cho et al., 2006).This work was supported by the Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) through the Environmental Health Action Program, funded by Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) (2018001350001).
Show full item record

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Kim, Soontae  Image
Kim, Soontae 김순태
Department of Environmental and Safety Engineering
Read More

Total Views & Downloads

File Download

  • There are no files associated with this item.