The healthcare and welfare policies of nations, as well as the amount of investments put into these areas, vary across countries. Investments in healthcare and welfare have been increasing worldwide which brings the question of assessing the efficiency of these investments. There are, however, difficulties in evaluating the effectiveness of such investments due to differences in countries’ economic development levels and due to the differences in data definition issues. There are only a limited number of studies in the literature that employ consistent and comparable indicators across countries. This study evaluates the healthcare investment efficiency and health competitiveness efficiency of 34 developing countries in Asia using a two-stage dynamic data envelopment analysis approach. Furthermore, we employ a broader measure of indicators on national healthcare and welfare policies and outcomes, in addition to the investment data on healthcare and welfare expenditures. Our findings indicate that the establishment of an investment environment with a consolidated approach and management is an important factor that increases the efficiency of investments in healthcare and welfare sectors. A consistent delivery of the national policy strategy is also crucial for reaching the medium-and long-term targets for each country. For example, if a country establishes healthcare and welfare policies that focus on improving its indicators with low efficiencies, the output will be improved and a better return on investment will be ensured in a long-term perspective.
This paper is based on a part of the Ph.D/DBA thesis of YongChan Kim (first author) written under the supervision of Erdal Atukeren and Min Jae Park in partial fulfillment of the requirements in the joint Ph.D/DBA program between Seoul School of Integrated Sciences and Technologies (aSSIST), and Business School Lausanne (BSL). We would like to thank the professors and coordinators at the Seoul School of Integrated Sciences and Technologies (aSSIST) and Business School Lausanne (BSL) for their great insights and supports. We would also like to thank four anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions that led to many improvements on an earlier version of the paper. The usual disclaimer applies.