Ajou University repository

Durability of initial antidiabetic monotherapy and subsequent treatment adjustment patterns among newly treated type 2 diabetes patientsoa mark
Citations

SCOPUS

10

Citation Export

Publication Year
2018-01-01
Publisher
Dove Medical Press Ltd.
Citation
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, Vol.14, pp.1563-1571
Keyword
Antidiabetic drugsDrug utilization patternsType 2 diabetes
All Science Classification Codes (ASJC)
Safety ResearchPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)Pharmacology (medical)Chemical Health and Safety
Abstract
Background: As newly available antidiabetic drugs (ADs) are used more commonly as initial hypoglycemic choice for early stage diabetes patients, there is an urgent need to investigate how these agents may differ in treatment durability relative to metformin. This study aimed to investigate the incidence and risk of treatment adjustment among newly treated type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients receiving an oral AD as initial monotherapy. Methods: T2DM patients registered in the National Health Insurance Program who were newly prescribed an oral AD were identified. Time to treatment addition or switch to alternative antidiabetic therapy was determined using the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) after adjusting for potential confounding factors. Results: The median time to treatment adjustment was shorter for sulfonylureas (SUs), dipep-tidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, alpha-glucosidase (AG) inhibitors, and thiazolidinediones (TZDs) compared to that for metformin. Initiation of therapy with SUs or DPP-4 inhibitors was associated with a significantly higher risk of both treatment addition and switching than with metformin (HR 1.49 versus 1.47 for overall treatment adjustment, respectively). In contrast, among incident users of AG inhibitors or TZDs, only the hazard of switch was substantially increased compared to metformin starters (6.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.77–6.64 and 7.31, 95% CI 6.35–8.42, respectively). When addition and switch events were collectively assessed, the risk of treatment adjustment was significantly elevated in all non-metformin cohorts. Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that the durability of metformin as an initial monotherapy was superior to that of other ADs, including newer classes of antidiabetics, and appeared to be more effective in delaying treatment adjustment in real-world clinical practice.
Language
eng
URI
https://dspace.ajou.ac.kr/dev/handle/2018.oak/30511
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2147/tcrm.s169964
Fulltext

Type
Article
Funding
This study was supported by the Ajou University Research Fund (No S-2017-G0001-00211), Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (No 2017R1C1B5015912), and the Bio and Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation funded by the Ministry of Science, Information and Communications Technology, and Future Planning, Republic of Korea (No. 2013M3A9B5075838). The national patient data for the analysis were provided by the HIRA. The contents of this research do not represent the official views of the HIRA.
Show full item record

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Lee, Sukhyang Image
Lee, Sukhyang이숙향
Division of Pharmacy Sciences
Read More

Total Views & Downloads

File Download

  • There are no files associated with this item.